Connect with us

DeFi

Two booming DeFi protocols have released similar code. Was it copied? – DL News

BlockChainGuardian Staff

Published

on

Two booming DeFi protocols have released similar code.  Was it copied?  – DL News
  • Riding the hype surrounding EigenLayer, fluid restoration protocols are growing at a rapid pace.
  • The code released by two liquid restoration protocols, Renzo and Kelp DAO, appears similar.
  • One of the protocols told DL News that its code had been copied.

Nearly identical lines of code released by two protocols that sit atop Ethereum’s sparkling liquid catering business have raised questions about their authorship amid a long-running debate over open source development culture of cryptography.

A DL News Analysis and interviews with developers not involved in the situation revealed identical “comments” nestled in the code of both protocols – a sort of note left by the developers – which suggest that one team copied it from the ‘other.

The code, published by competitors Renzo and Kelp DAO, enables what is called native restoration.

This feature allows users to bypass deposit caps that limit access to EigenLayer, the multi-billion dollar protocol that pioneered reinvestment on Ethereum.

It’s a heady time for the liquid restocking industry, and the protocols that leverage EigenLayer are ride the hype. Several have debuted in recent weeks, and older protocols, like Renzo, Ether.Fi and Kelp DAO, are growing rapidly.

Renzo has offered native recovery since December, while Kelp DAO teased its own native restore feature last week.

Not yet open source

“Kelp DAO’s native recovery solution is not active and the final code repositories are not yet open source,” a Kelp DAO spokesperson said in an emailed statement.

“Multiple intermediate versions of the code are used for testing/R&D before mainnet launch. Developers should use the final codebase deployed to mainnet as a reference.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

Kelp did not respond to a request for additional comment on the similarities.

Meanwhile, James Poole, Renzo’s chief technology officer, said DL News that the Renzo code was protected by a license which prohibits competitors from using it “in production”.

“There is no doubt that sections of Renzo’s code were copied into the Stader/Kelp DAO source code,” Poole said.

“If there are any questions about where our code base comes from, we would be happy to share our full GitHub repository with a third party for review.”

Comments and timestamps

The suspicious code was posted to GitHub, an online platform that allows software developers to create, store and share their work.

Timestamps on GitHub show that some of the native Kelp DAO rollback code was added in January, several weeks after Renzo released similar code.

But developers can backdate their additions. Additionally, Renzo’s code was, somewhat unusually, added in a few massive chunks, while Kelp DAO’s is showing steady “organic” growth, according to developers who spoke to DL News.

That’s because Renzo developed his software in a private repository, Poole explained.

“Many projects in the field follow the same model for reasons of competitiveness and optics,” he said. “Developing code can be a complicated process. »

Given the limits of publicly available data and the ease with which some GitHub data can be falsified, it’s difficult to prove who copied who, said Molly White, a software engineer and affiliate at Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society . DL News.

But one Audit of Renzo code released in December by crypto security firm Halborn suggests that Renzo did not backdate his additions, White said.

“The Halborn audit and the verifiable timeline of it makes me lean much more strongly toward taking kelp from Renzo rather than the other way around,” she said.

Kelp did not respond to a request for comment regarding White’s conclusion.

Like Uniswap v4, Renzo’s code is covered by a Business Source license, which protects the code in question from third-party use and profit for a certain period of time.

But that shouldn’t prohibit its use for testing, according to Moish Peltz, an intellectual property attorney at the New York law firm Falcon Rappaport & Berkman.

“My interpretation of BSL is that it allows for non-production use,” he said. DL News. “But the details will depend on the actual code involved.”

The code for Kelp DAO’s native staking functionality is protected by the more permissive GNU General Public License, or GPL, which allows commercial use by competitors provided their copy also uses the GPL or a similar license.

The open source debate

It’s the latest example of a problem plaguing an industry that touts open source development: To what extent should projects borrow or use someone else’s code, or tolerate a direct competitor doing so?

“If you’re just looking to pull the rug out or make a quick buck, it’s likely to cause an argument. And you’re an asshole.

Copying or borrowing another project’s code is generally encouraged in crypto, according to Matias Nisenson, CEO of DeFi Wonderland, a developer collective.

“It’s all about the value you bring to the ecosystem and the original developers,” he said. “If you’re just looking to pull the rug or to make some quick money, it will probably cause an argument. And you’re an asshole.

But developers who copy others’ code in good faith, believing they can improve on the work of the original developers, are often praised, provided they comply with licenses that govern how the code can be used, he said. for follow-up.

There are myriad examples in action: Reflexer, the team behind the experimental RAI project and HAI stablecoins, encourages forks. Spark protocol copied code from Aave lending protocol and now send Save part of your income.

“It’s always welcome to check with the developers first and see what they think of your ideas,” Nisenson said.

“The opposite scenario could also be true: someone wants to add value to an ecosystem and the original developers aren’t open to their ideas, so you develop them and build your vision. It’s fair game.

Still, crypto’s borrow-at-will philosophy sometimes causes friction. The problem flared up several times last year.

Open source advocates have criticized DeFi titan Uniswap for announcing a new iteration of its decentralized exchange under a Business Source license, effectively suspending its commercial use by competitors for four years.

Executives at crypto lending protocol Maple Finance complained that Circle was using their code without attribution. Circle says DL News at the time, he had not copied Maple’s code.

And Stader Labs, the parent company behind Kelp DAO, defended himself against accusations its liquid staking protocol was a “fork” or copy of competitor Rocket Pool.

Stader said the code in question was only a fraction of a much larger product built by Stader.

“Incorporating open source elements is a very common practice in software development, and even more so in the open source blockchain ecosystem,” Stader wrote in a blog post.

Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ DeFi correspondent in New York. Do you have any advice? Contact him at [email protected].

Fuente

We are the editorial team of BlockChainGuardian, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on BlockChainGuardian, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

DeFi

Cryptocurrency and defi firms lost $266 million to hackers in July

BlockChainGuardian Staff

Published

on

Crypto companies, defi lost $266m to hackers in July

In July 2024, the cryptocurrency industry suffered a series of devastating attacks, resulting in losses amounting to approximately $266 million.

Blockchain Research Firm Peck Shield revealed in an X post On August 1, attacks on decentralized protocols in July reached $266 million, a 51% increase from $176 million reported in June.

The most significant breach last month involved WazirX, one of India’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, which lost $230 million in what appears to be a highly sophisticated attack by North Korean hackers. The attack was a major blow to the stock market, leading to a break in withdrawals. Subsequently, WazirX launched a program in order to recover the funds.

Another notable incident involved Compound Finance, a decentralized lending protocol, which suffered a governance attack by a group known as the “Golden Boys,” who passed a proposal who allocated 499,000 COMP tokens – valued at $24 million – to a vault under their control.

The cross-chain liquidity aggregation protocol LI.FI also fell victim On July 16, a hack resulted in losses of $9.73 million. Additionally, Bittensor, a decentralized machine learning network, was one of the first protocols to suffer an exploit last month, loming $8 million on July 3 due to an attack targeting its staking mechanism.

Meanwhile, Rho Markets, a lending protocol, suffered a $7.6 million breach. However, in an interesting twist, the exploiters research to return the stolen funds, claiming the incident was not a hack.

July 31, reports The Terra blockchain protocol was also hacked, resulting in a loss of $6.8 million across multiple cryptocurrencies. As crypto.news reported, the attack exploited a reentrancy vulnerability that had been identified a few months ago.

Dough Finance, a liquidity protocol, lost $1.8 million in Ethereum (ETH) and USD Coin (USDC) to a flash loan attack on July 12. Similarly, Minterest, a lending and borrowing protocol, saw a loss of $1.4 million due to exchange rate manipulation in one of its markets.

Decentralized staking platform MonoSwap also reported a loss of $1.3 million following an attack that allowed the perpetrators to withdraw the liquidity staked on the protocol. Finally, Delta Prime, another decentralized finance platform, suffered a $1 million breach, although $900,000 of the stolen funds was later recovered.



Fuente

Continue Reading

DeFi

Centralized crypto exchanges are slowly losing ground to their DeFi counterparts

BlockChainGuardian Staff

Published

on

Centralized crypto exchanges are slowly losing ground to their DeFi counterparts

Centralized crypto exchanges are slowly losing ground to their DeFi counterparts, according to an in-depth data analysis conducted by Decrypt.

DeFiLlama’s decentralized exchange (DEX) volume data and CoinGecko’s total cryptocurrency trading volume data show that the percentage of cryptocurrency trading volume occurring on DEXs relative to total trading volume has increased from 4.6% in February to over 7% this month. This is an increase in the share of trading volume driven by DEXs of over 52%.

Source: Adrian Zmudzinski

Kunal Goel, a senior research analyst at Messari, told Decrypt that several factors are fueling the growth in DEX market share. He cited “the growth of meme coins and long-tail assets” as one of the reasons, explaining that they tend to list first on DEXs and only appear on centralized exchanges much later.if they last that long.

“The onchain user experience has improved with low fees and high throughput on Solana and Ethereum L2,” he added, highlighting advancements making decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions increasingly easier to use.

DeFiLlama data further shows that over the past 24 hours, DEX volume accounted for 22% of total trading volume. The crypto price aggregator notes that this percentage is meant to represent the dominance of decentralized exchanges over aggregated decentralized exchanges and centralized exchanges.

So far in 2024, DEX volume has seen a slow and steady increase.

CEX and DEX trading volume increased from $133.5 billion in January to $179.5 billion this month, an increase of about 34%. The year-to-date high was recorded in March, when CEX and DEX volumes saw a sharp increase, reaching $4.8 trillion and $266.89 billion, respectively.

Goel noted that at the time, “Bitcoin hit new all-time highs in March and trading activity is generally positively correlated with price and sentiment.” Looking ahead, he expects centralized exchanges to move on-chain and disrupt their own business models before others can. He added that “Base and BNB Chain are the most prominent examples of this.”

TradingView also shows a DeFi market cap dominance chart, in percentage terms. Currently at 3.86%, it fell from 4.47% on January 1 and hit a 2024 high of 4.81% on February 25. Goel noted that this was unexpected since “DEX volumes are a key driver of DEX value, so it’s a bit contradictory.”

Challenge is an umbrella term for a group of financial tools built on a blockchain, including DEXs, exchanges that operate primarily on-chain. The primary goal of DeFi is to allow anyone with internet access to lend, borrow, and bank without relying on intermediaries.

Similarly, the main goal of DEXs is to allow anyone with internet access to trade or even provide liquidity in exchange for a stake. DeFi and DEXs are one of the main areas of focus in decentralized application (dapp) development, which have seen considerable adoption this year.

Edited by Stacy Elliott.

Fuente

Continue Reading

DeFi

Pump.Fun Overtakes Ethereum in Daily Revenue: A New Leader in DeFi

BlockChainGuardian Staff

Published

on

Pump.Fun Overtakes Ethereum in Daily Revenue: A New Leader in DeFi

In a remarkable turn of events, Pump.Fun, a memecoin launchpad, has surpassed all other platforms in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, achieving the highest gross revenue in the last 24 hours. According to data from DeFiLlama, Pump.Fun amassed $867,429 during this period, surpassing Ethereum’s $844,276. This achievement underscores the growing influence of memecoin infrastructure within DeFi.

Pump.Fun Revenue Milestones

The impressive revenue numbers go beyond daily performance. Pump.Fun is generating $315 million in annualized revenue, averaging $906,160 per day over the past week. This revenue surge is largely due to the recent memecoin frenzy, with Solana-based memecoins being particularly popular among on-chain enthusiasts. The platform’s user-friendly interface allows non-technical users to quickly launch their own tokens, spending as little as $2 without needing to provide any initial liquidity.

How Pump.Fun works

Pump.Fun’s operating model is designed to facilitate the use and rapid launch of tokens. Users can create new tokens in minutes, which are then allowed to trade along a bonding curve until they reach a market cap of approximately $75,000. At this point, the bonding curve is burned on Raydium, establishing a secure liquidity pool. The platform generates revenue through a 1% fee on transactions made on the platform. However, once a token is bonded and burned on Raydium, Pump.Fun stops charging this fee.

Ethereum: Traditional Power

Despite its daily revenues, Ethereum remains a cornerstone of the DeFi ecosystem. It is the blockchain of Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency with a market cap of $395 billion. Ethereum powers many applications and digital assets, backing over $60 billion worth of smart contracts. Revenue generation on Ethereum is done through transaction fees, called gas, which are paid in ETH for executing transactions and smart contracts.

Comparative analysis of revenue models

While Ethereum’s revenue model relies on gas fees for transactions and smart contract executions, Pump.Fun takes a different approach. By enabling easy and low-cost token launches, Pump.Fun caters to a broad audience, including non-technical users. This inclusiveness, combined with the excitement surrounding memecoins, has led to rapid revenue growth. The 1% transaction fee ensures continued revenue generation until the token transitions to Raydium, creating a sustainable business model.

Memecoin frenzy

The recent rise in popularity of memecoins has been a major contributor to Pump.Fun’s success. Memecoins, particularly those based on Solana, have captivated the DeFi community, generating substantial activity on platforms like Pump.Fun. This trend highlights a shift in DeFi dynamics, where niche platforms catering to specific interests can achieve significant revenue milestones.

Future prospects

Pump.Fun’s recent successes suggest a potential shift in the DeFi landscape. As the platform continues to attract users with its simple token launch process and low-cost entry point, it could solidify its position as a leader in the DeFi space. The memecoin phenomenon shows no signs of slowing down, indicating that platforms like Pump.Fun could continue to see robust growth.

In conclusion, Pump.Fun’s ability to surpass Ethereum in terms of daily revenue underscores the evolving nature of the DeFi space. By providing a user-friendly platform for launching memecoins, Pump.Fun has tapped into a lucrative niche, demonstrating the potential for niche platforms to thrive alongside traditional blockchain giants like Ethereum. This development signals a broader trend toward diversification and innovation within the DeFi ecosystem, with new entrants challenging established players through unique value propositions and targeted services.

Fuente

Continue Reading

DeFi

$10 Billion Venture Firm May Target 10x Opportunities in Ripple (XRP) and This DeFi Token

BlockChainGuardian Staff

Published

on

$10 Billion Venture Firm May Target 10x Opportunities in Ripple (XRP) and This DeFi Token

According to recent reports, one of the largest venture capital firms is looking for new opportunities in the cryptocurrency space as Bitcoin (BTC) attempts to break its all-time high and start a new bull run in the cryptocurrency market. They are balancing risk with low-risk, low-reward and high-risk, high-reward opportunities.

The first investment candidate is a top cryptocurrency, Ripple (XRP); it doesn’t have much growth potential because it’s already a large cap. Another scenario the firm is targeting is DTX ExchangeThe new hybrid exchange is expected to revolutionize the foreign exchange industry. According to analysts, its growth potential is immense and the risk is also very limited due to its low price.

Market is bullish as Trump wants to make US a Bitcoin (BTC) superpower

Over the past 30 days, Bitcoin (BTC) has increased by about 10%, and one of the catalysts for this price increase has been Donald Trump recently speaking out as a crypto pro. Presidential candidate Donald Trump has promised to make the United States the world leader in cryptocurrencies if elected in November. Speaking at the Bitcoin2024 conference in Nashville, Trump compared Bitcoin (BTC) to the steel industry of 100 years ago, highlighting its potential.

Trump’s plans include firing SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and immediately creating a “Presidential Advisory Council on Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrencies.” He stressed the importance of American leadership in the cryptocurrency space, saying, “I am laying out my plan to ensure that the United States is the cryptocurrency capital of the planet and the Bitcoin (BTC) superpower of the world.”

$600 Million Worth of Ripple (XRP) to Be Released in August

Ripple (XRP), the company behind the XRP Ledger blockchain and its native token Ripple (XRP), unlocks up to 1 billion tokens on the first day of every month. Since 2017, they have used several major escrow wallets, including Ripple (XRP) (24) and Ripple (XRP) (25), to evenly distribute these monthly unlocks.

However, Ripple (XRP) often relocks a large portion of newly issued XRP. For example, on June 1, Ripple (XRP) relocked 800 million XRP but still sold about 300 million XRP, worth $182 million at the time.

While Ripple (XRP) releases up to 1 billion XRP tokens each month, the actual amount released into circulation is typically much lower due to this re-escrow process, as noted in a 2017 XRP Ledger blog post.

DTX Exchange Follows Bitcoin (BTC) Path

The main target of large private equity firms is the DTX exchange (DTX), the reason being a clearly high utility like Bitcoin (BTC). This project has attracted global attention thanks to its exceptional pre-sale performance, offering early buyers a 100% return on investment and raising over $1 million. Projections suggest that this figure will reach $2 million by the end of August 2024.

DTX Exchange offers a revolutionary hybrid trading platform, combining the best features of centralized (CEX) and decentralized (DEX) exchanges. Traders can enjoy a seamless experience with access to over 120,000 asset classes, no KYC verification upon registration and ultra-fast transaction speeds of 0.04 seconds.

These benefits have attracted traders to this new cryptocurrency exchange. Currently, in Phase 2 of its pre-sale, DTX Exchange is listed at $0.04, which is double its starting price of $0.02. Market analysts predict that the upcoming listing of DTX Exchange on the Level 1 CEX in late 2024 could trigger a 100x bullish rally, making DTX Exchange the top cryptocurrency exchange to watch.

Learn more:

Visit the DTX Presale

Read White paper

Join the DTX community

Disclaimer: The statements, views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily represent those of Crypto Reporter. Crypto Reporter is not responsible for the reliability, quality and accuracy of the materials contained in this article. This article is provided for educational purposes only. Crypto Reporter is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Do your research and invest at your own risk.



Fuente

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 BLOCKCHAINGUARDIAN.NET. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.